Company about
Home > Not Working > Samba Hide Files Not Working

Samba Hide Files Not Working

Contents

Figure 8-7. None Share delete readonly Boolean Allows a user to delete a read-only file from a writable directory. You probably will want to leave this option turned off unless a program (for example, an RCS program) needs this capability; many Windows users would be appalled to find that they'd Linux and Windows mark hidden files differently. http://johnfladung.net/not-working/samba-map-hidden-not-working.html

Create a directory on the Unix server inside the share, acting as the user under which you will log in to Samba. Starting collaboration through first e-mail. I'm curious about what you meant..? The default value of the map archive option is yes, while the other two options have a default value of no. https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch08.html

Samba Veto Files

However, user-level security on Windows 95/98/Me systems requires a Windows NT/2000 or Samba server to perform the actual authentication. If this option is not set, however, and a Windows user attempts to mark a file hidden on a Samba share, it will not work—Samba has no place to store the Even if they don't need the fine-grained control over file and directory permissions, they might find Samba's translation between ACLs and Unix permissions to be a source of confusion or frustration.

fake oplocks When this option is set to yes, Samba pretends to allow oplocks rather than actually supporting them. Unfortunately, this scenario is very real. This is where the delete veto files option comes in. Samba Directory Permissions This was known as the 8.3 format and was a huge nuisance.

A few clicks in Windows can render many things useless. Samba Follow Symlinks Not Working Texas, USA speed ticket as a European citizen, already left the country more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info The reverse is also possible; an executable Unix program looks like it hasn't been backed up recently on Windows. https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1046948 DOS and Windows file properties The definition of each bit follows: Read-only The file's contents can be read by a user but cannot be written to.

Currently, even if the option "map hidden = yes" is in my smb.conf, if I try to check 'hidden' in Windows Explorer the file/folder will not keep the attribute and when Samba Wide Links delete readonly This option allows a user to delete a directory containing a read-only file. Table 8-3. Like hide files, those files that begin with a dot have the DOS hidden attribute set, which doesn't guarantee that a client cannot view them.

Samba Follow Symlinks Not Working

Visit the following links: Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. http://superuser.com/questions/747753/showing-hidden-files-as-hidden-in-windows-from-linux-samba-share-of-ntfs-drive Code: # # Sample configuration file for the Samba suite for Debian GNU/Linux. # # # This is the main Samba configuration file. Samba Veto Files The share I'm trying to get to work is in [homes]. Samba Directory Mask yes Share hide files string (list of files) List of file patterns to treat as hidden.

The first client might need to write the entire file back to the server before the second client's file open request can succeed. this contact form This can result in significant improvements in performance on files that are written infrequently or not at all—especially executables—because all clients can then maintain a read-ahead cache for the file. What should I do about this security issue? Once in a while you might need to convert between a Unix umask and the equivalent Samba mask. Samba Unix Extensions

Does this confirm your theory? –bdr9 Apr 29 '14 at 23:59 It seems to, yes -- it's at least consistent with it. no Share inherit permissions Boolean If yes, permissions on new files and directories are inherited from parent directory. After that has happened, the operating system allows the open to complete. have a peek here The setup i have for this private share is follows: [private] comment = private share for certain users path = /media/drive/private create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 writable =

For example: 'smb.conf': security = user [private] ... Samba Inherit Acls force security mode The force security mode option can be used to define a set of permissions that are always set whenever the user on a Windows NT/2000/XP client modifies a But if a file stored on a Samba system is accessed by both a Windows network client and a local Unix process—without an additional coordination between the two systems—the Unix process

When used in conjunction with the map hidden option, of course. –Kromey Apr 30 '14 at 0:02 When I run chmod a-x on a file on the NTFS

Figure 8-11 illustrates this opportunistic locking process. Thanks ts Last edited by technosinner; January 22nd, 2009 at 08:48 PM. Here, we can set the basic permissions for a file, which are similar to Unix permissions, although not identical. Samba Follow Symlinks Outside Share There may also be issue with the $ character; again, I think it will work, but I'm not able to test it right now.) As always, the documentation is your friend.

Note that the group read/write and world read/write bits do not directly translate to a DOS attribute, but they still retain their original Unix definitions on the Samba server. Eliminate space between tikz figures Suggestions for easy peanut butter clean-up How can Average Joe create a micro-state that is a member of the UN in the least amount of time? button brings up the additional dialog box shown in Figure 8-8. Check This Out Heck, I would just make it 750 and then it just doesn't exist as far as others ar concerned.

I automated my job and the company doesn't know, what do I do now? kernel oplocks If a Unix application on the Samba host system (that is not part of the Samba suite) tries to open a file for writing that Samba has oplocked to None Share force user string (username) Effective username for a user accessing this share. This includes any files or directories at the other end of the link, as long as the permissions are correct for the user.

This behavior can be disabled by setting posix locking = no. Also while sifting through the forums I found a similar post, which might be of use to anyone who stubles on this one: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=127012 Thank you all for your help! Hidden This file has been marked to be invisible to the user, unless the operating system is explicitly set to show it. force directory security mode This option works exactly the same as the force security mode option, except that it operates on directories rather than files.

If this request goes unfulfilled for any reason and the second client starts writing to the file, the file can be easily corrupted as a result of the two processes writing As an example, suppose force security mode is set in a share thusly: [data] force security mode = 0440 (This sets the read bit for owner and group, but not other.) Having a problem logging in? Here's how it happened to me: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=688979 Oh, don't worry!

example files start with ($) hide files = /$*/ # hide pipes, sockets, devices ...